Verbal Reasoning Test
A passage, one statement, three answers. The number is how often you claimed the lines settled something they did not.
Settings
Changing one restarts the attempt, and scores set under different settings are not comparable.
Quick start
- 1Choose how many passages you want and what you see after each answer.
- 2Press Play now. A passage appears with one statement underneath it.
- 3Read the passage. Judge the statement on those lines and nothing else.
- 4Press True, False or Cannot say. The keys 1, 2 and 3 do the same.
- 5Read what settled it, then go on to the next statement.
Loading test
Why there is no comparison
Missed what the passage settles (%). Lower is faster. No published distribution exists for this task.
Every other test here draws your score on a bar of published results. This one cannot. Nobody has measured enough people on this task to say what a typical result is, so a bar here would be a picture of a number we made up.
Numbers for this task do circulate. The ones we could find name no study and do not agree with each other. We would rather show you nothing than repeat one of those.
No published distribution, and not CognitiveDrill data either. Nobody has measured this task on a large enough sample to say what a typical result is, so this page shows your number and does not rank it. Our own norm is published once a cohort reaches n = 1,000.
Try next
About this test
Cannot say is the answer being measured
Every statement here has three possible answers and only one of them is interesting. True and False are the answers a reader expects to be scored on. Cannot say is the one the format was built for.
Consider the bird count passage. It says no pochard were recorded on seventeen Sundays one winter. Read that quickly and you come away with pochard have never been seen here, which is a much bigger claim and one nobody made.
That slip has a name outside psychology. Grice described ordinary talk as running on one assumption. A speaker tells you what matters, so a reader treats what is left out as settled rather than as missing. It is a good rule for a conversation and a bad one for a document.
So the headline on this page is not how many you got right. It is how often you and the passage disagreed about whether the passage had an answer at all.
Two ways to get the third answer wrong
The number counts both directions, and it has to, because counting one of them would make the score easy to fake.
Answer Cannot say to all eighteen statements and you never over-reach once. If the headline only counted over-reaching, that run would read as a perfect score by a reader who did not read. Two thirds of it are ducks instead, and the number says so.
- Over-reaching. The lines do not settle the statement and you answered True or False anyway.
- Ducking. The lines do settle it and you said Cannot say rather than commit.
- A plain mistake. You saw that the passage decides, and picked the wrong side. That one is in your accuracy, not in the headline.
Why the passages are about nothing
Six passages, and not one of them is about anything. A library reopening, a warehouse move, a bird count, a school cycling scheme, a weekend of engineering work and a Roman brooch.
Dullness is the design. A passage about anything you have a view on stops measuring reading and starts measuring the view. That failure is what the critical thinking test on this site studies on purpose, and what this one has to avoid.
Outside knowledge is a second leak. Write about something a reader might already know and the answer arrives before the passage does. Nothing here can be looked up, because none of it is real.
Each passage carries three statements: one the lines settle as true, one they settle as false, and one they do not settle. That balance is fixed, so a run of four passages is always four unsettled statements out of twelve.
Where the format came from and who uses it
Watson and Glaser put a version of this on paper in the 1960s, in a subtest called Inference. A passage, a set of statements, and a scale running from definitely true to insufficient data.
Graduate schemes and law firms took it from there, and this is now one of the most sat test formats in the world. The publishers own the passages and they own the norms that go with them, and neither is published.
Geis and Zwicky put the underlying error somewhere more surprising: in the grammar. They showed that readers treat if you do this, that happens as though it also promised that nothing else does. A sentence invites a conclusion it never states, and most readers accept the invitation.
Speed is part of a real sitting and it is not part of this one. There is no clock on any statement here. Where speed is the whole score, the site measures it properly, and how processing speed shifts with age is built out of those tasks.
What the headline leaves to your accuracy
The number on the card is narrow on purpose, and the card carries three more figures so that nothing important hides behind it.
It is not a reading comprehension grade and it is not an English test. It says nothing about vocabulary, and the passages are written in plain words for that reason.
It is not a prediction of how you would do in a graduate sitting. This is the same format, not the same paper, and the two have no shared items and no shared norm.
There are six passages and eighteen statements in the whole pool. A second run repeats most of what you saw the first time, so what improves is your memory of these eighteen statements. That narrow kind of gain is the subject of do brain training games work. Read it before treating a better second score as a better reader.
Questions
What is a verbal reasoning test?
A passage of prose and a statement about it, answered True, False or Cannot say. Graduate employers use the format widely, and this page uses it too.
When should I answer Cannot say?
When the lines in front of you neither confirm the statement nor rule it out. Something you believe, or know from elsewhere, does not count as the passage saying it.
Why is the main number an error rate rather than a score?
Two other tests in this hub already report a percentage correct. This one reports the mistake the True, False, Cannot say format was invented to catch.
Can I get a perfect score by answering Cannot say every time?
No. Two thirds of every run is settled by the passage. Answering Cannot say to all of it counts as ducking two statements in every three.
What is a good result on this test?
Nobody has published a distribution for these passages, so the page does not rank you. It shows your figure, your accuracy and both kinds of mistake.
Is there a time limit?
No. Real sittings are timed and this one is not, because reading speed and reading carefully are two measures and the page reports only one.
Is this the same test employers use?
The same format, not the same paper. Their passages are owned property and their norms are private, so nothing here transfers to a real sitting.
Will my result improve if I run it again?
Probably, because the pool is six passages and you will have seen them. That is memory of these items rather than a change in how you read.
Sources
- Watson G, Glaser EM (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal: Forms A and B manual. Psychological Corporation. Link
- Grice HP (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole P, Morgan JL (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. Academic Press. Link
- Geis ML, Zwicky AM (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 2(4), 561-566. Link